Twitter exposes how govt. funded a ‘cottage trade’ of ‘disinformation labs’ that had been used to censor actual data and ban truth-tellers
3 min read
by: JD Heyes
(Natural News) In his newest Twitter Information report revealed on Thursday, journalist and writer Matt Taibbi highlighted the US authorities’s involvement in establishing a “new cottage trade” of “disinformation labs” that ostensibly combat towards false on-line propaganda within the title of nationwide safety.
As reported by Breitbart News, the “Twitter Information #17” thread concentrates on the Global Engagement Center (GEC), a State Division subsidiary, and its stated objective to “acknowledge, perceive, expose, and counter international state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed toward undermining or influencing the insurance policies, safety, or stability of the US, its allies, and accomplice nations.”
In accordance with the Twitter Information, the Digital Forensic Analysis Lab (DFRL) of the Atlantic Council, which is supported by the federal authorities by way of the GEC, continuously despatched lists of on-line profiles to Twitter executives and workers requesting censorship. In his report, Taibbi highlighted how the information media had been extra prepared to simply accept the federal government’s claims about “disinformation” with out questioning them, in contrast to Twitter, Breitbart Information reported.
Taibbi stated that information media personalities had been “a better mark” for accepting the federal government’s claims about “disinformation” in comparison with Twitter staffers who had been extra resistant. Taibbi additionally famous that the information media had been a better goal for false and unsubstantiated claims made by government-funded organizations such because the GEC and DFRL.
23.GEC’s sport: create an alarmist report, ship it to the slower animals in journalism’s herd, and wait as reporters bang on Twitter’s door, demanding to know why this or that “ecosystem” isn’t obliterated.
Twitter emails ooze frustration at such queries. UGGG! reads one. pic.twitter.com/Xkw7fOKZXL
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) March 2, 2023
Taibbi identified the superficiality of the newly established “anti-disinformation” organizations, and criticized the willingness of stories media to simply accept their unsubstantiated claims.
“Most of those ‘consultants’ know nothing,” he wrote. “Many have talent, when you can name mesmerizing dumb reporters a talent, however within the space of figuring out true unhealthy actors, few know greater than the typical particular person on the road.”
He famous additional, “The scary angle on GEC isn’t a lot the company because the sprawling infrastructure of ‘disinformation labs’ which have grown round it.”
46. Reauthorization for GEC’s funding is up for a vote this 12 months. Can we at the very least cease paying to blacklist ourselves?
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) March 2, 2023
“It’s an incubator for the home disinformation advanced,” a former intelligence supply instructed Taibbi, as he famous in his thread. “All of the shit we pulled in different nations for the reason that Chilly Struggle, some morons determined to carry house.”
He famous: “GEC may have averted controversy by specializing in exposing/answering disinformation’ with analysis and a extra public method, as [United States Information Agency] did. As a substitute, it funded a secret listing of subcontractors and helped pioneer an insidious – and idiotic – new type of blacklisting.”
The federal government-funded GEC “littered the media panorama with flawed or flat-out incorrect information tales. Exacerbating issues, People in each instances paid taxes to develop into the topic of those manipulative operations,” he wrote.
GEC handed some good info to Twitter, however principally not good data, in response to Taibbi’s analysis. He added that the “root downside was exemplified by a much-circulated 2020 report, ‘Russian Pillars of Disinformation and Propaganda.’”
GEC’s report on China was “extra leisure worth than something,” stated one analyst, in response to Taibbi. “It equates something pro-China, but in addition something towards China in Italy, as a part of Russia’s technique.”
“Twitter staffers had professionalism. They tended to have a look at least as soon as earlier than declaring a factor international disinformation. This made them a tricky crowd for GEC,” he wrote. “Happily, there’s a better mark: the information media.”
Right here’s the way it labored with GEC: “[C]reate an alarmist report, ship it to the slower animals in journalism’s herd, and wait as reporters bang on Twitter’s door, demanding to know why this or that ‘ecosystem’ isn’t obliterated.”
In brief, our personal authorities was (and nonetheless is) funding a psyop on People in the identical manner our intelligence companies used to do in international nations.
Sources embody:
